Jeremiyah Love vs Christian McCaffrey

Jeremiyah Love prices 20.3 points higher for dynasty. Full tale of the tape below, then model the deal yourself.

Player comparison

Metric RB Jeremiyah Love RB Christian McCaffrey
Team ARI SF
Position RB RB
Age 21 — leads 30
Redraft value 51.9 59.9 — leads
Dynasty value 51.9 — leads 31.6
VORP (redraft) 41.3 49.3 — leads
VORP (dynasty) 43.7 — leads 23.4

Highlighted cells mark the stronger figure for that metric. For age, lower is treated as the advantage in dynasty formats.

Model this trade

Both players are already loaded. Add picks or extra pieces to either side to find the package that balances the deal.

League settings

Team A receives

51.9pts

Type to search players, then use the arrow keys and Enter to add one to Team A.

  • RBJeremiyah LoveARI · Age 2151.9

Team B receives

31.6pts

Type to search players, then use the arrow keys and Enter to add one to Team B.

  • RBChristian McCaffreySF · Age 3031.62.57d

Verdict

Team A favoured

Net value · Team A

+20.3

Fairness

61%

RecommendationTeam B should request a 2nd or 3rd round draft pick to balance this trade.

Frequently asked

Who has more dynasty value, Jeremiyah Love or Christian McCaffrey?
Jeremiyah Love carries the higher dynasty value: 51.9 against 31.6, a gap of 20.3 points on our 0–100 superflex scale. Jeremiyah Love is 21 and Christian McCaffrey is 30, and dynasty pricing applies position-specific age decay on top of a market-derived value curve, not fantasy point projections.
Which player is better for redraft leagues?
For win-now redraft leagues, Christian McCaffrey is worth more: 59.9 against 51.9. Redraft strips out the age-decay term entirely, which is why the two formats can disagree on the same pair of players.
How does league size affect this trade?
Value is measured against the replacement-level starter at each position, and that baseline moves with league size. In a 14-team league the waiver pool is thin, so established starters like these hold more relative value. In an 8-team league the drop-off to a replacement RB is much smaller, which compresses the gap and makes draft picks comparatively more attractive.

Related trades