Justin Jefferson vs Davante Adams

Justin Jefferson prices 3.3 points higher for dynasty. Full tale of the tape below, then model the deal yourself.

Player comparison

Metric WR Justin Jefferson WR Davante Adams
Team MIN LAR
Position WR WR
Age 27 — leads 33
Redraft value 39.8 60.2 — leads
Dynasty value 39.8 — leads 36.5
VORP (redraft) 24.7 45.2 — leads
VORP (dynasty) 25.9 — leads 22.6

Highlighted cells mark the stronger figure for that metric. For age, lower is treated as the advantage in dynasty formats.

Model this trade

Both players are already loaded. Add picks or extra pieces to either side to find the package that balances the deal.

League settings

Team A receives

39.8pts

Type to search players, then use the arrow keys and Enter to add one to Team A.

  • WRJustin JeffersonMIN · Age 2739.8

Team B receives

36.5pts

Type to search players, then use the arrow keys and Enter to add one to Team B.

  • WRDavante AdamsLAR · Age 3336.5

Verdict

Team A favoured

Net value · Team A

+3.3

Fairness

92%

RecommendationTeam B should request a 2nd or 3rd round draft pick to balance this trade.

Frequently asked

Who has more dynasty value, Justin Jefferson or Davante Adams?
Justin Jefferson carries the higher dynasty value: 39.8 against 36.5, a gap of 3.3 points on our 0–100 superflex scale. Justin Jefferson is 27 and Davante Adams is 33, and dynasty pricing applies position-specific age decay on top of a market-derived value curve, not fantasy point projections.
Which player is better for redraft leagues?
For win-now redraft leagues, Davante Adams is worth more: 60.2 against 39.8. Redraft strips out the age-decay term entirely, which is why the two formats can disagree on the same pair of players.
How does league size affect this trade?
Value is measured against the replacement-level starter at each position, and that baseline moves with league size. In a 14-team league the waiver pool is thin, so established starters like these hold more relative value. In an 8-team league the drop-off to a replacement WR is much smaller, which compresses the gap and makes draft picks comparatively more attractive.

Related trades