Garrett Wilson vs Luther Burden
Garrett Wilson prices 32.0 points higher for dynasty. Full tale of the tape below, then model the deal yourself.
Player comparison
| Metric | WR Garrett Wilson | WR Luther Burden |
|---|---|---|
| Team | NYJ | CHI |
| Position | WR | WR |
| Age | 26 | 22 — leads |
| Redraft value | 41.9 — leads | 9.9 |
| Dynasty value | 41.9 — leads | 9.9 |
| VORP (redraft) | 26.8 — leads | -5.2 |
| VORP (dynasty) | 29.1 — leads | -2.9 |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger figure for that metric. For age, lower is treated as the advantage in dynasty formats.
Model this trade
Both players are already loaded. Add picks or extra pieces to either side to find the package that balances the deal.
Team A receives
41.9pts
Type to search players, then use the arrow keys and Enter to add one to Team A.
- WRGarrett WilsonNYJ · Age 2641.9▼2.07d
Team B receives
9.9pts
Type to search players, then use the arrow keys and Enter to add one to Team B.
- WRLuther BurdenCHI · Age 229.9
Verdict
Team A favoured
Net value · Team A
+32.0
Fairness
24%
RecommendationTeam B should request a 2nd or 3rd round draft pick to balance this trade.
Frequently asked
- Who has more dynasty value, Garrett Wilson or Luther Burden?
- Garrett Wilson carries the higher dynasty value: 41.9 against 9.9, a gap of 32.0 points on our 0–100 superflex scale. Garrett Wilson is 26 and Luther Burden is 22, and dynasty pricing applies position-specific age decay on top of a market-derived value curve, not fantasy point projections.
- Which player is better for redraft leagues?
- For win-now redraft leagues, Garrett Wilson is worth more: 41.9 against 9.9. Redraft strips out the age-decay term entirely, which is why the two formats can disagree on the same pair of players.
- How does league size affect this trade?
- Value is measured against the replacement-level starter at each position, and that baseline moves with league size. In a 14-team league the waiver pool is thin, so established starters like these hold more relative value. In an 8-team league the drop-off to a replacement WR is much smaller, which compresses the gap and makes draft picks comparatively more attractive.